Cotton gins were never manufactured at the Eli Whitney Museum and Workshop site. Nevertheless, the cotton gin is an important part of Eli Whitney’s legacy and impact on American history, and therefore part of the larger history of the EWMW.
The cotton gin is a tale of American innovative success: Eli Whitney was presented with a problem, and through mechanical experimentation, came up with a solution that revolutionized cotton agriculture. However, innovation can have unintended consequences, and there are few better examples of this than the legacies of the cotton gin.
Whitney’s invention had major consequences on human lives. Cotton agriculture was a plantation system, demanding vast amounts of labor and land. The boom in cotton-growing after the invention of the cotton gin therefore led to a massive increase in enslavement in the American south. It also contributed to forced expulsion of southern Native American tribes from their ancestral lands, which were then turned over to cotton agriculture. It fueled the growth of the cotton mill industry in both the American north and the United Kingdom. And it increased southern plantation owners’ economic and political power, further entrenching the system of slavery and contributing, in turn, to the Civil War.
Whitney could not have predicted these outcomes, but they are nevertheless significant impacts of his work which are important to acknowledge today.
CAPTION: A cotton gin in the late 1800s. This image makes the work of loading the gin and packing the finished cotton look easier, cleaner, and more peaceful than it would have been in reality. New York Public Library, Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, b10165337.
The Story of the Cotton Gin
After Eli Whitney completed his degree at Yale in 1792, he travelled towards South Carolina with the intention of becoming a tutor to wealthy children to earn money for law school. A fellow traveller, Catherine Littlefield Greene, invited him to instead visit her plantation north of Savannah, Georgia. The plantation was primarily focused on rice, the primary crop of coastal Georgia and South Carolina at the time, but they also grew cotton.
One of the greatest challenges of cotton agriculture was removing the plant’s large, sticky seeds from among the valuable fibers. This work was done by hand by enslaved laborers, and it was both physically demanding and very slow. It could take one worker many hours to produce one pound of cleaned fiber.
Whitney’s solution to this problem was a machine with two cylinders that combed the cotton and pulled it through small holes, leaving the seeds behind. It has been suggested that Catherine Greene also contributed ideas to the design. The finished machine led to a vast improvement in efficiency: one small gin could produce 50 lbs of cotton in a day, the equivalent of several hundred hours of hand labor.
CAPTION: Patent drawing for Eli Whitney’s cotton gin, 1794. Patent #72-X, The National Archives.
The increased efficiency of the cotton gin meant cotton could be produced on a much larger scale. Cotton is measured in bales, a standardized cube of 500 pounds of fiber. In 1790, the United States produced less than 9,000 bales of cotton annually, or about 45,000 pounds; by 1800, the country was producing more than 200,000 bales, or over 1 million pounds. By 1860, production had reached over 4 million bales annually, or 2 billion pounds. Cotton was by far the country’s largest agricultural export, and by 1830, finished cotton goods were also the country’s largest industrial export.
Cotton and Slavery
Because the gin made cotton processing much more efficient, it also made cotton growing much more profitable. Cotton agriculture boomed, and every new acre of cotton grown required more enslaved labor to maintain it. The birth of the cotton gin therefore exponentially increased the demand for slavery in America and the suffering caused by that system.
The gin made the removal of seeds easier, but the tasks of planting, growing, and harvesting the cotton were still horrifically arduous. The enslaved workers picked around 200 pounds a day of cotton under the summer sun, and faced violence if they did not meet expected quotas. Enslaved workers also ran the gins and presses that processed the cotton, and it was not safe or easy: the labor was hard, the machines had many hazardous moving parts, and the small cotton fibers expelled into the air caused lung damage.
CAPTION: Working inside a cotton gin building in Dahomey, Mississippi, 1899. The gins are in the background on right. The men on the left are operating a cotton press to make a bale. Library of Congress, LC-DIG-ppmsca-53149.
In 1790, three years before Whitney invented the cotton gin, around 700,000 people were enslaved in the United States, primarily on southern tobacco and rice plantations. Cotton was also grown, but the difficulty of processing it meant it was a relatively minor crop. By 1860, around 4 million people were enslaved in the American states and territories - an increase of more than 550%. Cotton was the primary plantation crop. Around 2.5 million people were enslaved in the cotton-growing regions of the Atlantic coastal plain and the deep south, from eastern Maryland to Texas. Every one of these individuals had their own story, and every one was impacted by the forced labor, violence, familial separations, and personal and cultural resistance inherent in enslavement - a system supported by the cotton gin’s success.
Cotton and Native American Expulsion
In the 1830s, the hunger for new land for cotton agriculture was a major factor in the forced displacement of Native American people from the southeastern United States. The American government expelled the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee (Creek), and Seminole tribes from their lands and forced them to walk to the new Indian Territory west of the Mississippi (now Oklahoma), an event known as the Trails of Tears. It is estimated that at least 60,000 people made the journey, with more than 8,000 people dying on the way. These peoples’ ancestral land, much of it in the heart of the southern cotton belt, were turned over to white landowners.
The marches of the 1830s were part of a long history of violence, forced removals, and other genocidal actions against Native Americans. By the 1850s, Whitney guns became a favored weapon of the rangers and civilians as white settlers continued to use violence to claim more and more western land from Native American tribes.
CAPTION: Map showing Native American lands at the time of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 (dark green) and the Indian Territory in future Oklahoma (yellow-green), with the routes of the Trails of Tears. Wikimedia Commons.
CAPTION: Map showing the areas of greatest cotton production in the United States, c. 1850. New York Public Library, Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, b11664211.
Cotton and Industry
This boom in cotton growing created by the cotton gin could not have come at a better time. Between the 1730s and 1770s, British inventors had mechanized every step of textile manufacturing, from spinning the thread to weaving the fabric. These included John Kay's flying shuttle (1733), James Hargreaves’s spinning jenny (around 1764), Richard Arkwright's spinning frame and water frame (1769), and Samuel Crompton’s spinning mule (1779). At the same time, other inventors and engineers were improving water power and developing steam power, and applying those innovations to the textile machines.
These innovations meant that the spinning and weaving industry could move from home spinning wheels and looms to vast mechanized mills. The first mills were established in Lancashire, a region with abundant access to water power and proximity to ports where cotton could be imported. By the late 1780s, there were over 200 cotton mills in the United Kingdom. By 1860, there were over 2,500 mills in Lancashire alone. Industrialists in New England took note of the British innovations, and the first American cotton mills opened in Rhode Island in the 1780s. By 1860, there were nearly 300 cotton mills in Rhode Island, with many more in the other northern states, especially Massachusetts.
CAPTION: Spinning thread and weaving cloth in an English cotton mill, 1830s. From Edward Baines, History of the cotton manufacture in Great Britain. Wellcome Collection, EPB/B/11968.
The rapid growth of the British cotton industry meant that they needed to import more and more cotton, which does not grow in the United Kingdom. Similarly, the cotton mills of the American north needed cotton from elsewhere. After the invention of the cotton gin, the American south was ready to answer this demand. Cotton agriculture and the cotton industry boomed alongside each other, with supply increasing and increasing to meet demand.
The dual boom of cotton agriculture and the cotton industry had many further effects. Cotton was one of the first large-scale mechanized industries. The need for labor resulted in the rapid expansion of industrial towns and cities, with vast numbers of people leaving rural areas for work in the mills. Concerns over working conditions in mills resulted in some of the first labor movements and the growth of child labor regulations. And the industry’s need for power led to the growth of coal mining and resultant fossil fuel pollution. In many ways, the cotton boom was a major step towards our modern industrialized world, and it was made possible only by the increased production of cotton after the invention of the cotton gin.
In Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 , the Constitution empowers Congress "To promote the progress of science and useful arts by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries." Patent law must carefully balance the rights of the inventor to profit from his or her invention (through the grant of a temporary monopoly) against the needs of society at large to benefit from new ideas.
The patent bill of 1790 enabled the government to patent "any useful art, manufacture, engine, machine, or device, or any instrument thereon not before known or used." The patent act of 1793 gave the secretary of state the power to issue a patent to anyone who presented working drawings, a written description, a model, and paid an application fee. Over time the requirements and procedures have changed. Today the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is under the auspices of the Commerce Department.
Eli Whitney Patents His Cotton Gin
In hopes of making a patentable machine, Whitney put aside his plans to study law and instead tinkered throughout the winter and spring in a secret workshop provided by Catherine Greene. Within months he created the cotton gin. A small gin could be hand-cranked; larger versions could be harnessed to a horse or driven by water power. "One man and a horse will do more than fifty men with the old machines," wrote Whitney to his father. . . . "Tis generally said by those who know anything about it, that I shall make a Fortune by it."
Click here to open this animation full screen.
But patenting an invention and making a profit from it are two different things. After considering possible options, Whitney and his business partner, Phineas Miller, opted to produce as many gins as possible, install them throughout Georgia and the South, and charge farmers a fee for doing the ginning for them. Their charge was two-fifths of the profit -- paid to them in cotton itself.
And here, all their troubles began. Farmers throughout Georgia resented having to go to Whitney's gins where they had to pay what they regarded as an exorbitant tax. Instead planters began making their own versions of Whitney's gin and claiming they were "new" inventions. Miller brought costly suits against the owners of these pirated versions but because of a loophole in the wording of the 1793 patent act, they were unable to win any suits until 1800, when the law was changed.
Struggling to make a profit and mired in legal battles, the partners finally agreed to license gins at a reasonable price. In 1802 South Carolina agreed to purchase Whitney's patent right for $50,000 but delayed in paying it. The partners also arranged to sell the patent rights to North Carolina and Tennessee. By the time even the Georgia courts recognized the wrongs done to Whitney, only one year of his patent remained. In 1808 and again in 1812 he humbly petitioned Congress for a renewal of his patent.
After the invention of the cotton gin, the yield of raw cotton doubled each decade after 1800. Demand was fueled by other inventions of the Industrial Revolution, such as the machines to spin and weave it and the steamboat to transport it. By mid century America was growing three-quarters of the world's supply of cotton, most of it shipped to England or New England where it was manufactured into cloth. During this time tobacco fell in value, rice exports at best stayed steady, and sugar began to thrive, but only in Louisiana. At mid century the South provided three-fifths of America's exports -- most of it in cotton.
However, like many inventors, Whitney (who died in 1825) could not have foreseen the ways in which his invention would change society for the worse. The most significant of these was the growth of slavery. While it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton. In fact, the opposite occurred. Cotton growing became so profitable for the planters that it greatly increased their demand for both land and slave labor. In 1790 there were six slave states; in 1860 there were 15. From 1790 until Congress banned the importation of slaves from Africa in 1808, Southerners imported 80,000 Africans. By 1860 approximately one in three Southerners was a slave.
Because of the cotton gin, slaves now labored on ever-larger plantations where work was more regimented and relentless. As large plantations spread into the Southwest, the price of slaves and land inhibited the growth of cities and industries. In the 1850s seven-eighths of all immigrants settled in the North, where they found 72% of the nation's manufacturing capacity. The growth of the "peculiar institution" was affecting many aspects of Southern life
While Eli Whitney is best remembered as the inventor of the cotton gin, it is often forgotten that he was also the father of the mass production method. In 1798 he figured out how to manufacture muskets by machine so that the parts were interchangeable. It was as a manufacturer of muskets that Whitney finally became rich. If his genius led King Cotton to triumph in the South, it also created the technology with which the North won the Civil War.
Caney, Steven. Steven Caney's Invention Book. New York: Workman Publishers, 1985. (Interesting case histories.)
Green, Constance M. Eli Whitney and the Birth of American Technology. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Educational Publishers, 1965. (Still available in paper.)
Mirsky, Jeannette and Allan Nevins. The World of Eli Whitney. New York: Macmillan Co., 1952.
Murphy, Jim. Weird and Wacky Inventions. New York: Crown Publishers, 1978. (Includes drawings of unusual inventions submitted to the Patent Office with clues to aid the reader in guessing the invention.)
Text taken entirely from:
http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/cotton-gin-patent/
Cotton Gin Kit
A simplified model of Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Assembly required. Contact Helen Barajas for more information and pricing.
More information on cotton gins and the ginning process may be found at the government website for the USDA Agricultural Research Service's Cotton Ginning Research Laboratory. http://www.ars.usda.gov/main/docs.htm?docid=3408
If you are looking for gins 'that work', such as Roller Gins and "small" motorized gins, try this link: http://www.cottonacres.com/cotton-gin/
Another very informative site on cotton production and all related processes in the production of organic cotton tee shirts is ANVIL knitwear's Track My T module on their website. http://trackmyt.com/#/home
https://www.nps.gov/blrv/learn/historyculture/cotton-economy.htm
https://brooklyntweed.com/blogs/blog/the-legacy-of-the-u-s-cotton-economy-by-sha-mira-covington
https://eji.org/report/transatlantic-slave-trade/new-england/#industries-reliant-on-enslaved-labor
https://millmuseum.org/permanent-exhibits/temporary-exhibits/past-exhibits/the-cotton-connection/
https://www.nps.gov/blrv/learn/historyculture/cotton-economy.htm
https://teachinghistory.org/history-content/ask-a-historian/24411
